Connect AFAS and Act-on

Connecting AFAS and Act-on for a company would involve establishing data flows between the two systems, allowing information such as customer records or financial data to be exchanged. This could support improved reporting, enhanced marketing activities, or more efficient business processes by reducing manual data entry and ensuring more up-to-date information across both platforms.

You can build this integration on the System2System platform. We design the connection between AFAS and Act-on around the way you work — not as an off-the-shelf connector, but to fit your systems.

Contact us

Why connect AFAS and Act-on?

A company that uses both AFAS and Act-on could benefit from connecting the two systems to enable more consistent and timely data exchange. When systems operate in isolation, staff may need to enter the same data in both places, which increases the risk of errors, consumes additional time, and can result in records that are no longer aligned. For example, customer or employee information could be updated in one system but not the other, leading to confusion and decisions based on outdated or incomplete data. If a connection were established, it could allow for the transfer of information such as contact details, transactional records, or campaign responses between AFAS and Act-on. This could help ensure that both systems reflect the most current information, reducing manual effort and improving the quality of reporting and operational processes. The specific types of data that could be exchanged would depend on the functionalities of AFAS and Act-on that are relevant to the company’s processes, such as HR, finance, or marketing data. What can actually be exchanged depends entirely on what each system exposes through its API, and is determined for each situation individually.

How System2System builds an integration

Connectors

We connect to each system through the interface it offers — an API, a database, a file exchange or a webhook — and handle authentication, rate limits and retries.

Mapping

Fields rarely line up one to one. We map and transform the data so both systems receive it in the shape they expect.

Workflow

We define what triggers an exchange, in which direction data flows and which system takes precedence when the two disagree.

Monitoring

Every exchange is logged. Failures are flagged and can be replayed, so nothing disappears without anyone noticing.

What can actually be exchanged?

That depends on what AFAS and Act-on make available through their APIs, on the licences and modules in use, and on the version each system runs. Which records are synchronised, in which direction and how often, is something we determine together before any work starts.

We are happy to look at your specific situation and tell you what is feasible — including when the answer is that it is not.