Skip to Content

Connect AFAS and InRiver

Connecting AFAS and InRiver for a company that uses both could make it possible to transfer product data and related information between the systems. This could help ensure that product records are consistent across platforms, reduce manual data entry, and support more efficient management of product information and business administration processes.

You can build this integration on the System2System platform. We design the connection between AFAS and InRiver around the way you work — not as an off-the-shelf connector, but to fit your systems.

Contact us

Why connect AFAS and InRiver?

A company that operates both AFAS and InRiver could benefit from connecting these systems to enable data exchange. Without such a connection, staff may need to enter the same information into both systems, which can be time-consuming and increases the risk of errors. Over time, records in AFAS and InRiver could drift apart, meaning that product information, pricing, or inventory details may not match across platforms. This lack of synchronization could result in decisions being made using outdated or inconsistent data, potentially affecting customer service and operational efficiency. If a connection were established, it could enable the transfer of key data between AFAS and InRiver. Common types of data exchanged between systems of these categories include product details, pricing, inventory levels, and possibly customer or order information, depending on the business processes involved. The specific data that could be exchanged would depend on what each system is designed to handle and what is exposed through their respective APIs. Ultimately, the exact nature of the data exchange would be determined by the capabilities of the systems and the requirements of the business.

How System2System builds an integration

Connectors

We connect to each system through the interface it offers — an API, a database, a file exchange or a webhook — and handle authentication, rate limits and retries.

Mapping

Fields rarely line up one to one. We map and transform the data so both systems receive it in the shape they expect.

Workflow

We define what triggers an exchange, in which direction data flows and which system takes precedence when the two disagree.

Monitoring

Every exchange is logged. Failures are flagged and can be replayed, so nothing disappears without anyone noticing.

What can actually be exchanged?

That depends on what AFAS and InRiver make available through their APIs, on the licences and modules in use, and on the version each system runs. Which records are synchronised, in which direction and how often, is something we determine together before any work starts.

We are happy to look at your specific situation and tell you what is feasible — including when the answer is that it is not.

About these systems

Read more about each system and what it can be connected to

Looking to connect these systems?

Talk to us about what your setup needs. No obligation.

Contact us