Connect Edifact and Unit4

Connecting Edifact and Unit4 for a company would involve enabling the transfer of data between the electronic data interchange format used for structured business documents and the enterprise resource planning functions managed by Unit4. Such a connection could support automated document exchange and improve the accuracy and speed of business process execution.

You can build this integration on the System2System platform. We design the connection between Edifact and Unit4 around the way you work — not as an off-the-shelf connector, but to fit your systems.

Contact us

Why connect Edifact and Unit4?

A company that operates both Edifact and Unit4 could benefit from connecting these systems to enable data exchange between them. Such a connection could help reduce the need for manual data entry, which often results in duplicated effort and increases the risk of errors. Without a connection, there is a greater chance that information such as orders, invoices, or customer records could be entered differently in each system, causing records to drift apart over time. This misalignment could lead to decisions being made based on outdated or inconsistent figures, which can affect operational efficiency and financial accuracy. If Edifact is used for electronic data interchange and Unit4 for enterprise resource planning, the kinds of data that could be exchanged might include purchase orders, invoices, payment information, and inventory updates. Exchanging this data could help ensure that both systems reflect the same up-to-date information, supporting better coordination between departments like finance, procurement, and logistics. The specific data that can be exchanged would depend on what each system exposes through its API and is determined for each situation.

How System2System builds an integration

Connectors

We connect to each system through the interface it offers — an API, a database, a file exchange or a webhook — and handle authentication, rate limits and retries.

Mapping

Fields rarely line up one to one. We map and transform the data so both systems receive it in the shape they expect.

Workflow

We define what triggers an exchange, in which direction data flows and which system takes precedence when the two disagree.

Monitoring

Every exchange is logged. Failures are flagged and can be replayed, so nothing disappears without anyone noticing.

What can actually be exchanged?

That depends on what Edifact and Unit4 make available through their APIs, on the licences and modules in use, and on the version each system runs. Which records are synchronised, in which direction and how often, is something we determine together before any work starts.

We are happy to look at your specific situation and tell you what is feasible — including when the answer is that it is not.